PDF Ebook What Photography Is, by James Elkins
What Photography Is, By James Elkins. The industrialized modern technology, nowadays support every little thing the human demands. It includes the everyday tasks, works, workplace, home entertainment, and more. Among them is the wonderful website link and also computer system. This problem will reduce you to assist one of your hobbies, reviewing practice. So, do you have eager to review this e-book What Photography Is, By James Elkins now?
What Photography Is, by James Elkins
PDF Ebook What Photography Is, by James Elkins
Reviewing a publication What Photography Is, By James Elkins is sort of easy activity to do every single time you want. Even reviewing each time you desire, this activity will not disrupt your various other tasks; many individuals commonly review guides What Photography Is, By James Elkins when they are having the extra time. What about you? Exactly what do you do when having the downtime? Do not you invest for pointless points? This is why you should get guide What Photography Is, By James Elkins and also try to have reading behavior. Reading this publication What Photography Is, By James Elkins will certainly not make you useless. It will certainly offer much more perks.
The reason of why you could obtain and get this What Photography Is, By James Elkins faster is that this is the book in soft file form. You can review guides What Photography Is, By James Elkins any place you really want also you are in the bus, office, home, and other areas. But, you might not need to move or bring guide What Photography Is, By James Elkins print any place you go. So, you will not have larger bag to bring. This is why your selection to make much better principle of reading What Photography Is, By James Elkins is actually practical from this situation.
Understanding the means how you can get this book What Photography Is, By James Elkins is additionally valuable. You have actually remained in appropriate website to begin getting this details. Obtain the What Photography Is, By James Elkins web link that we supply here and also check out the web link. You can buy the book What Photography Is, By James Elkins or get it as soon as possible. You could quickly download this What Photography Is, By James Elkins after obtaining offer. So, when you require guide rapidly, you can straight get it. It's so simple therefore fats, isn't it? You should favor to this way.
Merely link your device computer or gadget to the web connecting. Obtain the contemporary innovation making your downloading and install What Photography Is, By James Elkins finished. Even you don't intend to check out, you can directly shut the book soft file and also open What Photography Is, By James Elkins it later on. You can likewise effortlessly obtain the book almost everywhere, because What Photography Is, By James Elkins it is in your gadget. Or when being in the workplace, this What Photography Is, By James Elkins is likewise advised to review in your computer tool.
In What Photography Is, James Elkins examines the strange and alluring power of photography in the same provocative and evocative manner as he explored oil painting in his best-selling What Painting Is. In the course of an extended imaginary dialogue with Roland Barthes's Camera Lucida, Elkins argues that photography is also about meaninglessness--its apparently endless capacity to show us things that we do not want or need to see--and also about pain, because extremely powerful images can sear permanently into our consciousness. Extensively illustrated with a surprising range of images, the book demonstrates that what makes photography uniquely powerful is its ability to express the difficulty--physical, psychological, emotional, and aesthetic--of the act of seeing.
- Sales Rank: #9385106 in Books
- Published on: 2011-04-26
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 8.50" h x 5.75" w x .75" l, 1.10 pounds
- Binding: Hardcover
- 240 pages
Review
'The most exciting feature for me of this fascinating book was its articulation of the importance of writing in our engagement with photography. Writing for Elkins means the capacity to elicit articulate intensity in the tracking of the intricate turns and balances that can, and should, take place in a mind responding to expressive non-discursive materials. Here the distinctive feature of photography as a medium is not the punctum or the pursuit of sublimity but the photograph's powers for producing self-reflexive attention to how the work makes us see our own seeing--a power that is at risk when we become proud of the rhetorics that displace what the engagements of distinctive writing can bring to our attention.' - Charles Altieri, University of California, Berkeley
'In an impassioned dialogue with Roland Barthes, Jim Elkins argues that photography is not "about" representation and memory―those aspects of the Barthean punctum; rather, photography is "at war with our attention." If we focus on its essential materiality and physicality, photography shows us things we would often prefer not to see―the "splotches and stains, cracks, unpleasant shadows, errant dust" in our natural environment as well as the human pain too hard to look at and yet unavoidably there. What is given by photography is the "grainy substance of the world" in all its irritating contradictions, its "displeasures"--the aporias that make the act of seeing itself so difficult. Elkins’s disillusioned meditation on how photography actually works upon the viewer is as original as it is profound.' Marjorie Perloff, author of Radical Artifice: Writing Poetry in the Age of Media and Unoriginal Genius: Poetry by Other Means in the 21st Century
About the Author
James Elkins is E.C. Chadbourne Chair in the Department of Art History, Theory, and Criticism at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. He is the author of Pictures and Tears, How to Use Your Eyes, Stories of Art, Visual Studies, Why Are Our Pictures Puzzles, Our Beautiful, Dry, and Distant Texts, On the Strange Place of Religion in Contemporary Art, and Master Narratives and Their Discontents, all published by Routledge.
He is editor of Art History Versus Aesthetics, Photography Theory, Landscape Theory, The State of Art Criticism, and Visual Literacy, all published by Routledge.
Most helpful customer reviews
9 of 9 people found the following review helpful.
A good book goes against a great book
By John Armstrong
At the beginning of What Photography Is (WPI) author James Elkins notes that while it shares a title format with a book he wrote some years before, What Painting Is (2000), it is not a companion to the earlier work, and relates to it only in a very general way. What WPI is is his response to Roland Barthes' Camera Lucida (CL, 1980) one of the most famous and influential books ever written about photography, and, for Elkins, one of the most frustrating and annoying.
In the preface to the book he states his intention to "write against and through" Barthes, and moreover to do so in the form that Barthes chose for Camera Lucida, which is free-flowing personal writing which avoids, as much as possible, the heavy apparatus of academic discourse (above all documented references to the author's own and other academic writers' theories and sayings) and explores its subject in a direct, subjective, even introspective way.
He begins Chapter 1 "Writing" by offering his own version of the first couple paragraphs of CL, taking over whole sentences but making two substantive changes: (1) the inciting image, where he substitutes for Barthes' picture of the younger brother of Napoleon ("I am looking at eyes that looked at the Emperor") a picture of a selenite window in a Southwestern adobe structure, and (2) the medium to which photography is declared to be in opposition, substituting for Barthes's Cinema his own Painting. (The latter seemingly referring to his other book because he does not talk at all about painting in the body of WPI). After that he goes off on his own and talks about writing and Barthes' CL and concludes the chapter by saying (p. 14): "The only way to reply to a book as strange as Barthes's is to write another one even stranger." And then, in the next five chapters, he does exactly that.
In Chapter 2 "Selenite, Ice, Salt" he comes back to the image of the selenite window that he started out with and adds two more, one looking down into transparent (where not cracked) lake ice and another, a magnified image of a crystal of rock salt that contained (until scientists extracted it) a bubble of trapped water - and bacteria - from the Permian Age. In the end he dismisses all three as "failed looks into or through something" and "failed photographic windows." He includes some more photos, including Kertész's Little Ernest, which Barthes' included in CL as an example of death as punctum ("Is he alive today?") and which Elkins takes as Barthes' canonical "ordinary" image (i.e. other than the described but unshown picture of his mother at age 5 posing with her brother in the Winter Garden). In this chapter Elkins rejects Barthes' punctum-dependent way of looking at photographs as yielding only "toy journeys" and at the same time, I think not totally consciously, starts to reveal his own way of looking, which, with its little made up stories about the origins of scratches and marks and smudges and masked out areas, seems every bit as much about toy journeys, even if of a very different kind.
Chapters 3, 4, and 5 "From the Green River to the Brunswick Peninsula", "A drop of Water, World Trade Center Dust", and "The Rapatronic Camera" are the heart of the book (even though Elkins says at some point that his book has no heart). They contain many photographs that most people would accept as within the normal limits of photography, and they are clearly carefully selected and grouped. Elkins continues to "write against" Barthes in these chapters, but he also talks a lot about various kinds of photography, even if, more often than not, mostly to reject them. In Chapter 3 he rejects photographs of people (Barthes's terminal weakness). In Chapter 4 he gives a much longer list, starting with people (including family photos, found photography, and street photography), and then also the sublime, the picturesque, the surreal, the simply beautiful, and anything with overt cultural or emotional content. As part of this he rejects practically all fine art photography (the one exception being Thomas Demand, because he takes pictures of paper). For him all these kinds of photography are "distractions". What's left when you eliminate them all is what he calls "hard" photography.
The approved images, with some omissions, are as follows. Chapter 3: side-by-sides, including Mark Klett's uncannily exact reshootings of Timothy O'Sullivan images done over 100 years before, Robert Humphrey's reshootings of all (?) the obelisk markers on the Arizona-Mexico border (done by a scientist for scientific purposes), and his own grandmother's "Red Dot" stereoscopic images (which Elkins praises as exceptionally high-quality 3D), then photos that become interesting through blown-up details, including the anonymous ca. 1924 picture of Darwin's Rhea (a rare flightless bird found in Tierra del Fuego, which appears on the WPI cover). Chapter 4: pictures with murky (unfocused, smeared-looking) "surrounds", and lots of microphotographs of one-celled (or less?) organisms, some made by the author using his own equipment. And Chapter 5: five 1 millionth of a sec exposures of the beginnings of an atomic explosion taken by Harold D. Edgerton (whose iconic drop of milk image had been rejected by Barthes in CL as an example of a "shock" picture i.e. a guaranteed attention getter).
In Chapter 6 "Lingqi" Elkins returns to pictures of people, but only of the most bizarre - or for him, "hardest" - sort. Apart from some general discussion it is entirely devoted to a series of anonymous photos taken in Beijing in 1905 of a man being executed by lingqi or "death by a thousand cuts". The chapter includes 11 images, some of which are details of others. Elkins indicates that he learned of the pictures from a posthumously published book of George Bataille and has published them himself in other places and also has used them as course materials. Here he gives virtually no context (what he does give is on pp. 193-4, where he says that the goal was not infliction of pain but the destruction of the soul - ah the mysterious orient). He stresses the difficulty of looking at the pictures and seems to advocate (including to his students) their use a way to experience pain through photography, but it's not clear to me whether the goal is enlightenment or simply self-flagellation. He talks a lot of theory in the chapter, about the body as a locus of pain and monstrosity, but does not touch on a point that Barthes might have made had he looked at the pictures and thought about them, which is the difference between photography and film: what Christian Metz said after him, that looking at photography is fetishism (the looker controls the image), whereas looking at film is voyeurism (the image controls the looker). I think the linqgi would be much more "difficult" as film than as the collection of photographs that Elkins presents.
Chapter 6 is the last chapter, and the last nine pages of it leave the main subject of lingqi behind and offer a conclusion to the whole book. He returns to the world of art history and theory and criticism that he left behind (mostly) at the beginning of the book and appears ready to go back to academic business as usual. He concludes as follows: "I have tried to write against the warm, moist and invasive sadness [of Barthes' CL]. I have tried to write a sterile book, with a minimum of interruptions from pathos, art, memory, loss or nostalgia, because that is what I think photography also is." The final sentence is ambiguous, but I read it as meaning that photography is also sterile as the book is.
As opposed to each other as they seem to be, WPI and CL are for me much more alike than different. Two smart people who care about photography pick a few photographs (from thousands, from millions) and weave stories around them. They put aside their academic modes of thought and focus on articulating and rationalizing their feelings. Barthes' pictures cluster around the center of photography (what it is about for the vast majority of people); Elkins are scattered around the periphery, where few people go. But interestingly, they agree on something where many others would disagree: they both gravitate to straight photography in which the relationship of the image to the object (or at least the physical object) is as direct as the optics will allow. (I assume this is why Elkins, p. 175, dismisses the work of Noriko Furunishi, whose dizzying earthscapes, manipulated as they are, seem a perfect fit for his "hard" aesthetic.) They also are both accepting, if not actively biased towards, black and white photography. And finally I would say that they are both resistant to whatever in a photograph is being forced on them by the photographer, and respond to it by settling on something else to look at in the picture. (This, I believe, is what underlies Barthes' jump from the studium to the punctum.)
CL and WPI are both all about reception of photographs and say little about production, intent, or cultural significance, or about photography as art. CL is more proactive (creative if you will), Elkins more reactive. That may be partly due to timing, but it probably also reflects a difference in their temperaments. I personally prefer Barthes because he says things that catch me by surprise. Elkins doesn't do this, his thought process is just too orderly.
CL is a great book. WPI is a good book. Neither is for everybody. If you're going to read either one, I recommend reading both. 4 stars for WPI.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful.
Get Camera Lucida as well
By Ericazk
Make sure that you also get Camera Lucida to read in conjunction with this, but it is a must read for any art photographer.
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful.
Possibly one of the worst books I've read
By Veronica
Posiblemente uno de los peores libros que he leído. Se trata de un monólog interno del autor, repleto de divagaciones, que resultan en muy pocas conclusiones interesantes. Si "Camera Lucida" es tu libro de cabecera tal vez te interese leerlo, sino lo has leído hazlo, porque de otra forma jamás entenderás la pelea que tiene Elkins con Barthes.
Possibly one of the worst books I've read. This is an internal monolog of the author, full of digressions, resulting in very few interesting conclusions. If "Camera Lucida" is your bedside book you might want to read it, but do you read it, because otherwise you will never understand the fight that Elkins has with Barthes.
See all 4 customer reviews...
What Photography Is, by James Elkins PDF
What Photography Is, by James Elkins EPub
What Photography Is, by James Elkins Doc
What Photography Is, by James Elkins iBooks
What Photography Is, by James Elkins rtf
What Photography Is, by James Elkins Mobipocket
What Photography Is, by James Elkins Kindle
* PDF Ebook What Photography Is, by James Elkins Doc
* PDF Ebook What Photography Is, by James Elkins Doc
* PDF Ebook What Photography Is, by James Elkins Doc
* PDF Ebook What Photography Is, by James Elkins Doc
